November 1999 Archives

Truly Magical Television

Ladies and gentlemen, there is way too much stuff on TV.

Need proof? Let us examine the television offerings for Tuesday, November 23 at 10 p.m. More specifically the programming choice of ESPN2, the bastard child of ESPN that showcases cheerleading competitions, rodeos and dog shows, yet still has the temerity to suggest it is The Worldwide Leader in Sports.

And how did ESPN2 attempt to justify its claim as The Worldwide Leader in Sports? By televising the 1999 Magic: The Gathering World Championships.

Magic: The Gathering, for those of you who don't spend your free time debating whether Tasha Yar could kick Seven of Nine's ass, is a card game. Think of it as Dungeons & Dragons for those lacking the athletic prowess to throw dice.

Football is a sport, my friends. As are baseball, soccer, fencing and dwarf tossing. Those are suitable fodder for The Worldwide Leader in Sports. Even in a world where ballroom dancing qualifies as an Olympic event and the X Games makes heroes out of bungee jumpers, the Magic Championships just goes too damn far.

There is no possible argument for Magic as a sport. None. If someone says, "But Magic players exercise their minds," I'll start throwing punches. Baseball teams might get away with having one or two Fernando Valenzuelas on a roster, but the entire U.S. Magic team makes Terry Forster look like a Calvin Klein Bikini Briefs model.

What, you weren't aware that the U.S. even had a National Magic Team? And you call yourself a patriot? The fact of the matter is that the U.S. Magic team kicks butt. We've won four world championships, this latest one the result of our thrashing of a plucky yet outgunned German team.

As U.S. team member Charles Kornbluth put it, "It's an honor just to be here at the championships, representing the U.S." By golly, here's a kid going all out for his country. Move over, Mary Lou Retton. Get this guy a Wheaties box, pronto!

Of course, the Germans didn't take the loss very well and promised to do something about it. Apparently they've hired a new general manager, the former East German swimming coach, who has enlisted the help of some of his old friends. Already there are rumblings about a promising rookie, the world's first elite female player, an ex-East Berliner named Olga who can cast Cursed Scrolls left and right, bench press 400 pounds and has a voice like Barry White.

But this year belonged to the good ol' U.S. of A. Bringing the action to us were play-by-play commentators Brian and Chris, neither of whom were ever shown on camera, probably because they are slightly older versions of Harris and Bill from "Freaks and Geeks." There even was a cheery sideline reporter named Todd, who actually did appear on camera. Todd looked a lot like you expect TV personalities except for his death grip on the microphone and the thousand-yard stare in his eyes that said, "This was not what I had in mind when I applied to work for ESPN."

Unfortunately, I missed the first couple of matches, but managed to tune in for the crucial slugfest between American Kyle Rose and German Marco Blume. This was Rose's match to lose, yet he almost fumbled away his chances.

Presented with what was apparently a rather good hand, Brian or Chris seemed to think the match was in the bag. "As you know, a turn four wildfire can be very devastating." Well, duh! Thank you so much, Captain Obvious.

Yet Rose didn't see it that way and evidently made some sort of mistake that sent both Brian and Chris into a fit of hyperactive chimp chatter. "A lot of people would have played a cursed scroll there!" "I don't see the point of playing a mountain wild card!"

From Honolulu to Martha's Vineyard, a nation held its breath. Would Kyle Rose cost us the championship because of his boneheaded mountain wild card? Curse you, Kyle Rose! A pox on your first born!

But Blume was just as incompetent and quickly screwed things up even worse. When it was all over, Rose had taken the match three games to one and we were treated to an instant replay of Blume's tragic mistake. You've never seen instant replay until you've seen Magic: The Gathering instant replay.

"Blume played a City of Traitors and couldn't wildfire," the announcers explained somberly. The camera zoomed in slow-motion as Blume lowered the fatal card to the table. "It was a devastating mistake that doomed him." Indeed it was. Joe Theismann's shattered leg and Marco Blume's City of Traitors. Two images burned into my mind forever.

The subject of injuries didn't come up but I can imagine such thoughts must weigh heavily on the minds of the players. A really nasty one must be a godawful mess, made all the more repugnant by incessant replays from a dozen camera angles. "Oh, dear lord in heaven! He's torn his City of Traitors almost completely in half! The trainers are rushing out with the Scotch tape, but frankly Brian, I don't think there's much they can do!"

With the Rose-Blume match decided, the U.S. championship hopes rested on the ample shoulders of Zvi Moshowitz. Surely you've heard of Zvi Moshowitz. Creator of the Zvi Bargain deck? Yes, that Zvi Moshowitz.

Evidently, each player can pick and choose the cards in his Magic deck. Moshowitz's Zvi Bargain is one humdinger of a deck, according to Brian and Chris. "Zvi's Bargain is one of the most difficult decks in the world to play well. Moshowitz is one of only a few top players confident enough to play this deck," they pronounced.

What the hell are these cards made of? Plastic explosives? While that would have made for a much more exciting television experience, sadly, it was not to be. With all the hype surrounding him, I expected Zvi, dressed head-to-toe in leather, to come charging onto the playing floor through a wall of fog and lasers while "Bad to the Bone" played at ear-bleeding decibels.

But there was no was taunting of the audience, no beautiful bikini-clad girls getting into hair-pulling fights, no folding chair violence. Instead there was only Zvi, a man who probably waddles a lot more than he charges, already sitting down, ready to face off against his bitter rival, Germany's David Brucker.

But this match was a laugher from the start. As everyone knows, Brucker's Living Death deck "is historically weak against combo decks" like Zvi's Bargain. Within a couple minutes, it was obvious Moshowitz-Brucker would be the fantasy card game equivalent of Tyson-Spinks.

Just a couple minutes into the brouhaha, Brian and Chris were already all atwitter. "Ladies and gentlemen, we could be watching a turn two kill here!" And just like that, it was all over. Delusions of Mediocrity -- bam! Mox diamonds -- crunch! Blaze spell -- pow! And Brucker is down for the count!

You could almost hear Al Michaels screaming "Do you believe in miracles? Yes!" The only thing missing was the US team's hosting of Moshowitz onto their shoulders for a victory lap. Then again, judging from Moshowitz's Michelin Man physique, that was probably for the best.

Who needs football or baseball now? The next generation of athletic heroes are the ones who stay at home, avoiding sunlight, physical fitness and social interaction. Thank goodness the Worldwide Leader in Sports will be there covering every single Magic championship and Quake Deathmatch.

Of course, there's some work that still needs to be done before Magic: The Gathering can become a true television spectacle. There's no halftime show and precious few opportunities for blimp shots. And where are the obnoxious celebrations? You slam down a Scroll of Monkeys, you dance, dammit! Cheerleaders would be a big improvement, too. Maybe dressed in "Star Trek" uniforms.

And who will bring all of this to you ? The Worldwide Leader in Sports, of course. Can ESPN's Magic: The Gathering Primetime be far behind?

Go Away, All Ye Faithful

Hey Christmas: Fuck off.

I mean that, Christmas. Go away. You're not wanted here. It's the first day after Thanksgiving and I'm already sick to the teeth of your smarmy, cheery, phony face.

You're everywhere -- in the malls, in my mail, on my TV. You're all over my TV. Already. One day after Thanksgiving -- a full month before you have any right to be on my mind -- and you've already planted your fat, ugly, red-and-green ass in the middle of my living room, all over my TV.

You wouldn't be so bad if you weren't so overbearing, Christmas, so omnipresent, so constantly in-my-face. If you lasted a few days or so -- a week tops -- I'd out-happy that little crippled dork, Tiny Tim. I'd spread cheer and sing merry tunes and be filled with the glowing love of the holiday season.

But, no, a week's not enough for you, is it? Hell, a month's not enough any more. When I saw my first Yuletide commercial, the week after Halloween, I knew you were going to hang around longer -- and with nastier results -- than an intestinal virus. You're one greedy holiday, Christmas.

Look, it's your business if you're intent on becoming a year-round event, but I resent the fact that I now must spend well over a twelfth of my viewing life suffering through the tiny hell known as Christmas TV.

Can't we do without the carpet-bombing of holiday ads, Christmas? A whole month dedicated to artificially happy people, doing artificially happy things? Wouldn't just putting a pillow case over our heads and demanding the cash be easier?

Yes, yes, I know. The whole of the American economy depends on us sheep obeying the commands of the television. We're supposed to trudge down to the Commerce Hut and fork over more money that we actually have because some guy with a messianic complex got himself in trouble with the authorities two thousand years ago. I get it. I'll do it, just like I'm supposed do. The Savior of Mankind told me to shop at Macy's.

But frankly, Christmas, I've already had all the colorful, skating Gap kids I can take. The thought of another month of that sort of exuberant perkiness makes me want to do something objectionable with a shotgun and innocent by-standers. I promise to buy the stuff if you just leave me alone.

Of course, at least the ads have the decency to pitch me some expensive version of personal contentment and then crawl back into their dank little holes. You're much worse, Christmas, when you start seeping into the shows.

Christmas episodes! Christmas specials! Christmas telethons! Oh, joy! Oh, rapture! Aw, shit...

I'm gritting my teeth, Christmas, at the thought of watching every freakin' character on every freakin' show on every freakin' channel learn the True Meaning of the Holiday Season. Again. Didn't it sink in from last year? Can't they just watch their own re-runs? Why do I have to go through it another time? I remember from before!

This time, Christmas, when Rudolph and his stop-motion friends come around, I'm going to be waiting with a hair dryer and some sterno. Mr. Heat Miser's got nothing on me, Christmas. Frosty's a puddle.

It's all so predictable, so tedious. Over the next four weeks, I just know I'm going to see an endless parade of tree trimmings and turkey cookings; wacky Santas doing un-Santaly things; unlikely miracles attributed to the magic of the season. Hell, I fully expect to see a Very Special Holiday Episode of "Crocodile Hunter," in which that insane Australian is gored by a reindeer.

So, damn you, Christmas; damn you and all the merriment you drag in your wake. I hate you. Go away. Get out of my face and get the hell off my TV.

And while you're at it, take that bastard New Year's with you.

And I'm Thankful That Sweeps Coincides With Thanksgiving

Turkey and television are inextricably entwined. As a wee lass, I camped out in front of the set watching the Macy's Thanksgiving Day parade and vibrating with holiday anticipation. I wanted to gambol through the festive streets of New York City, warbling songs with a backup complement of marching bands and giant balloons and soaking in 100-percent holiday spirit.

Imagine my disappointment when I moved to Troy, New York and discovered that the only dancing I was going to be doing in the streets was around urine puddles left by the transient population. But I digress.

Thanksgiving was for television -- for my mother's anguished "Oh, God!" when I clicked on the set at 8 a.m. for parade coverage, for the drowsy armchair quarterbacking every male in my family committed while the womenfolk cleaned the dishes and speculated on the effort it would take to dress and carve the football watchers, for the traditional post-pumpkin pie viewing of The Sound of Music, wherein Julie Andrews would twirl through the Alps while my family sang, "The hills are alive with the sound of gunfire..."

Yes, television fostered some warm family memories for the holidays. Even as a jaded adult Vidiot, I look forward to November viewing with gleeful anticipation. Not only is it sweeps month, but it's sweeps month and Thanksgiving! What more could you want?

Well, if you're me, you could want more Thanksgiving episodes that don't deliver some homily about the real meaning of holidays to a group of people who aren't related to each other. I'm looking in your direction, O Subgroup of Sitcoms About Wacky Friends and Coworkers. I'm calling you out, O Workplace Dramas Where Principal Characters Have No Private Lives. I understand that people don't always spend Thanksgiving nestled in the bosom of their family; I've spent the last three Turkey Days on the West Coast because nothing -- not even boundless familial love and the prospect of doing the postprandial dishes -- can prod me into flying back East on the worst travel day of the year. I also understand that sometimes, the familial bosom leaks venom. Or you're an orphan. Or you have created a family of people who, while important to you, are not the ones who are related to you.

But let's hear it for more Thanksgiving episodes that celebrate the fragile peace around a table, when Dad is heroically straining not to say anything about Junior's earring and Sis has promised not to wear her NARAL pin in front of deeply pious Grandma. Let's see the small dramas that play out in the kitchen every year -- whose stuffing do we use, Mom's or her daughter-in-law's? Will Grandpa go nuclear if we suggest using a store-bought pumpkin pie? How does one make vegan gravy for one's college cousin anyway?

Usually, we get episodes from otherwise respectable television shows where the "traditional" notions of family holidays are shredded by the intrusion of all-too-real events like divorce, estrangement, or long-simmering arguments. Many Thanksgiving episodes, in fact, seem bent on one message -- I hope you smug turkey munchers enjoy your stuffing while others have to work or endure dysfunctional family gatherings or have their loneliness rubbed in their face by Rockwellian dolts like you.

I'm deeply derisive of most holidays and their attendant hysteria. In fact, I believe I recently uttered, "Oh, shit, it's Christmas soon." I am in no way a holiday junkie -- these things tend to creep up on me, and after some tired grumbling about the vultures at Hallmark, pass without further comment or effort on my part. A favorite Yuletide tradition at Das Schmeiser Haus is to upbraid me for my eye-rolling Scrooge tendencies. But I'm a sucker for Thanksgiving. It's the only national holiday we have that bothers to contemplate what might have been -- starvation, scalping, and another depressing example of colonization gone horribly wrong -- and reminds us to be grateful for what we ended up with instead. Given that the nation's biggest holiday, Christmas, has become paired with relentless consumerism, it's nice to have a holiday that only asks us to sit down for a meal with our folks and find something to be thankful for in our lives.

Family dinner and gratitude deserve better than episodes about the unfairness of tradition and familial interaction. Just once, I'd like to see more shows look at families like you would mashed potatoes (lumpy and imperfect, but decent nonetheless) rather than a flock of turkeys (genetic mutants whom one deals with once a year). That would make me very thankful for November sweeps programming.

Oh -- and if the programming whizzes at NBC could see fit to suspend their all-new ER in favor of "Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade Bloopers," I'd be super-thankful for that too.

Blowing Smoke Up Our Asses

Smoke 'Em While You Got 'Em

So I'm watching The Practice and this commercial comes on with a woman thanking the Philip Morris Corporation for funding shelters for battered women and their children.

I should note by the way, that I'm a smoker.

Perhaps this is a measure of my cynicism, but the way this woman was going on about Philip Morris, I half expected her to implore me to "keep on smoking!" Or at the very least, bad-mouth the tobacco settlement.

She did neither, and yet the commercial left me feeling pretty good. Because now I have pretty good ammunition the next time a non-smoker makes a face when I light up: "Hey, I'm doing this for children, pal."

Thank you, Philip Morris!

--James Collier

You gotta love Philip Morris.

Recently, the nation's No. 1 distributor of oral carcinogens launched an ad campaign to let the world know what else it's good at. No longer content to get its props as the leading profiteer of lung cancer, heart disease and emphysema, the company began running a series of Phil-good television commercials last month.

You may not know it, but Philip Morris funds domestic violence centers, sends tangerines to food banks and counsels convenience store clerks against peddling smokes to kids. It's also the corporate parent of Kraft Foods and Miller Brewing.

The company spent $60 million on charitable efforts last year, according to this $100 million "Making a Difference" PR campaign.

Fittingly enough, one of the ads ran during the Oct. 21 episode of ER, which included a storyline about a pregnant woman endangering her fetus by smoking. If this tie-in is a result of corporate synergy between the cigarette maker and a TV network, I hope we'll be seeing more of it in the future -- "tune in next week as Ally McBeal is date-raped by the Marlboro Man in a daffy dream sequence!"

As part of the effort, Philip Morris is even admitting that cigarettes are both unsafe and addictive. Company exec Steven Parrish told an AP reporter that the tobacco conglomerate is committed to improving lives -- not counting, presumably, the 418,000 people each year whose smoking-related deaths disqualify them from further improvement.

I'm a lifetime non-smoker (can you tell?) with genuinely hostile feelings towards Philip, R.J., Brown, Williamson, Joe Camel, the Congressional delegation from North Carolina and both Benson and Hedges. These new TV ads are aimed directly at me, and I haven't felt this much loving attention from a tobacco company since my early teen-age years.

After seeing these commercials, there's a question I'd like to ask Philip Morris and Leo Burnett, the Chicago ad agency that's running this campaign:

What are you smoking?

No amount of TV commercials is going to make me experience branding bliss with a tobacco company. These Kodak moments about battered wives living in Philip Morris shelters may cause a lump in the throat, but most of the smokers in the viewing audience will subsequently schedule a doctor's appointment to check whether that lump is cancerous.

Additionally, no one who feels warmly about a company like Kraft Foods is going to transfer those feelings to Philip Morris. You make a recklessly harmful and addictive product that has killed millions of people and is going to kill at least five million more, according to present estimates. Until last week, you didn't even admit it was harmful, blowing smoke up our ass for so many years the whole country needs a proctological look-see for abnormal cell growth.

Now you're eagerly telling the world you also make Kraft Macaroni and Cheese, Kool-Aid drink mix, Oscar Meyer weiners, Miller beer, Jell-O gelatin... a whole family of products not normally associated with merchants of death.

Your "Making a Difference" campaign has already worked. The next time I'm in a building and the Kool-Aid Man bursts through a wall, there's no way I'm going to run towards him to eagerly drink the liquid in his head with my friends.

Instead, I'm calling the cops.

Additional contributions to this article by: Rogers Cadenhead, James Collier.

Take A Clue From Blue

I've been watching a lot of Blue's Clues, Nickelodeon's hit children's television show, lately. And I've spent a lot of time trying to figure out what it is I like about it. Because I do like the show, even though it's ostensibly aimed at preschoolers.

The first thing I think, almost every time I see the show, is Poor Steve. As just about the only live creature appearing on the show -- the rest of the cast is animated and added in post-production -- poor Steve must display a level of earnestness few people will ever attain in their whole lives while interacting with non-existent props, sets, and characters, all within the same nine square feet -- even when he walks, he walks in place -- and all the while staring into the level gazes of no-doubt grizzled and jaded representatives of the camera and lighting operators' union. This is a job for someone who won't crack -- no matter what.

But my pity for Steve isn't why I like the show. My respect for him has something to do with it, but not all. After many weeks of soul-searching, I finally figured out why I like Blue's Clues so much.

I think Blue's Clues is a great show because of its complete and utter lack of irony.

Irony has been with us for a long time. Ever since the first hideously overweight caveman got hit on the head with a rock and grunted "That going to leave mark," before expiring, we have had sarcasm and irony. But it didn't become the national pastime until the mid-'70s when Saturday Night Live hit the airwaves. That show was so ironic, so sarcastic, and so popular, that its attitude rapidly seeped like intellectual toxic waste into the tap water of American consciousness. And no wonder: as David Lipsky has written, irony is the comic presentation of doubt; and by the mid-70s, Americans were doubting in a serious way.

By now everything is in doubt, and so everything is ironic. Nothing can be taken as it stands. You can't read a single sentence, watch a single show, see a single movie without having to look for the wink, the nudge, the aside, the smirk that says, "We don't mean this. We're kidding. We're not really this upset, or worried, or happy, or sad, or anything. Don't take us seriously."

Children's television has not been excepted from this. Pee-wee's Playhouse, as enjoyable a show as it was, was really just one extended wink from start to finish. Sesame Street is simply riddled with irony and adults-only jokes: When Elmo tunes to the Jacket Channel to learn about jackets and it says, "Up next: Jacket Nicholson in 'Five Easy Jackets'!" even some grown-ups aren't going to get it. Teletubbies is earnest in content, but the world of the show is so surreal it qualifies as irony all on its own.

But in Blue's Clues there isn't even a whiff of irony. Sarcasm cannot be seen from its soundstage. In Blue's little world, there are no winks, no asides, no obnoxiousness or distancing, no doubt. Even when you think they might slip over -- even when Steve interprets a shadow, a feather, and the sound "Hoo hoo" as maybe meaning the feather wants to shadowdance with a disco "Hoo hoo!" (the true answer was an owl) -- Steve keeps the joke way over on the serious side of the line.

Considering my angst-filled, doubt-riddled existence, Blue's Clues is refreshing. It takes me back to when I was a kid, when I said what I meant and meant what I said, before I learned that you don't tell people how you really feel without making it clear that you're only kidding.

Just kidding.

Fall '99: "Time Of Your Life"

I like to think of myself as the supervillain of TV criticism. Plotting. Lurking. Stalking my prey, setting them up in the cross-hairs, cackling with glee in anticipation, and patiently waiting for the perfect moment to unleash my critic's wit.

But even a hardened critic like myself can lose his nerve. I know I have the shot. I want to take the shot. I need to take the shot. And I can't.

Jennifer Love Hewitt has that effect on me.

I'd like to unload on Time of Your Life--both barrels a-blazing--but then I think of those big brown eyes of hers, it's like looking into the eyes of sweet little puppy. And that smile of hers, that goddamned smile that could light up a friggin' stadium. And those tits. How can you expect me to unload on girl with a rack like hers?

I can't... I just can't do it.

If I were a stronger man, I'd tell you that if I hear Hewitt make one more rambling speech about coming to New York to "find myself" I'm gonna throw up. And I'd make a wisecrack that I've heard better dialogue in a badly dubbed kung-fu movie.

But I'm weak. I sit at my computer, I close my eyes and I have visions of those perfect perky pears in a tight cashmere sweater. Or perhaps a sequined tube top. Or braless in a cute little halter top.

If I were a strong man, I'd say that someone needs to tell Jennifer Garner, who plays Hewitt's roommate, to stop yelling her lines and try acting for a change. And I'd definitely say that Jonathan Schaech, the actor who plays Hewitt's love interest, needs to shave -- the whole rock-star stubble thing isn't working for me.

But I can't. The breasts... the breasts won't let me.

If Jennifer's breasts didn't have complete and utter control over me, I'd rant about the cinematography and the art direction. Everyone is darkly lit like they're characters in the movie "Seven." I want to say that New York hasn't looked this gritty since the Koch administration, and that a show that stars Jennifer Love Hewitt, America's Sweetheart nonetheless, should be filled with bright colors and beautiful light.

But I can't. Because... well, you know why.

I want to lash out at all of the convoluted crap in the pilot and subsequent episodes: Finding an apartment in Manhattan in one day? A super who also happens to be a funky club kid? A zany roommate who happens to be an actress? Finding a job at a bar that is conveniently just across the street from the apartment you found in one day? Having an epiphany on the subway that New York is the place?

But I can't... I just can't do it. Those breasts... those incredible breasts. They tell me to do bad things, you know. Crazy things... I fight... I fight... Time of Your Life is a horri... a gr... a grea... a great show. It has top-notch acting, clever writing, and it's a wonderful way to spend a Monday night.

I can't. I can't do it. The show stinks. There, I said it. I can only pray that Jennifer's breasts will forgive me.

Negro For Sale: Sold!

CBS acquires Negro in Record-Setting Online Auction
Yahoo!
NewsHome - Yahoo! - My Yahoo! - News Alerts - Help

Variety
 Home | Top Stories | Business | Tech | Politics | World | Local | Entertainment | Sports | Science | Health 

Entertainment Headlines
Monday November 15 10:26 AM ET

CBS acquires Negro in Record-Setting Online Auction

LOS ANGELES-- In what analysts are calling the most successful online auction of a Negro to date, the CBS television network has purchased James Collier from the internet website TeeVee.

While the details of CBS' winning bid were not disclosed, it estimated that the deal, which includes cash and stock, is in the range of $12-17 million.

"I feel like I've just won the lottery," said a beaming TeeVee Editor Jason Snell at a joint CBS-TeeVee press conference. "If we had known Collier was worth this much coin, we'd have sold his black ass a long time ago. In fact, we've already started fielding offers for Peter Ko, who, I'd like to add, comes from very good Chinese stock."

At the press conference, CBS CEO Les Moonves hailed the acquisition of Mr. Collier as "groundbreaking."

"We knew we'd have stiff competition from the other networks, but thanks to our aggressive package we were able to seal the deal," he said.

Moonves, when asked about CBS' plans for Collier, said, "First, I'd like to announce we have legally changed Mr. Collier's name to 'Toby.' Second, as for our plans for him, we feel that the best return on our company's investment in Toby would be gained by putting him out to stud."

And if Mr. Collier gets out of line?

"You let me worry about that," chuckled CBS chief operating officer Mel Karmazin, brandishing a bullwhip.

Moonves bristled when a reporter charged that the sale of Collier was nothing more than a high-tech slave auction.

"I resent your use word of the 'slave'," Moonves said, "We see this more as a case of high-tech indentured servitude. Mr. Collier -- Toby -- will be used as we use every other writer. And if he tries to run, we'll break his ankles. Standard procedure."

CBS's acquisition pushes the percentage of writers who are black at the network up from 1.4 percent to 2 percent. Said Moonves, "This is proof positive we are dedicated to this cause."

"This is a great day for diversity," NAACP President Kwami Mfune said in a statement released to the press. "It's wonderful to see Hollywood to finally learn to embrace the talented people in our community."




Questions or Comments
Copyright © 1996-1999 Goiters Limited. All rights reserved.
Republication or redistribution of Goiters content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Goiters.
Goiters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Negro for Sale

tvBay item 186293499 (Ends 11/15/99, 10:01:03 EST) - NEGRO FOR SALE: JAMES COLLIER
tvBay logo

to Browse, Sell, Services, Search, Help, and Community

NEGRO FOR SALE
Item #186293499
Television:Services:Sitcom:Writers

Bidding is closed for this item.

Show description
Bid!
Currently $27,000,000 First bid $525,000
Quantity 1 # of bids 13
Time left None Location New York City
Started 11/11/99, 21:01:03 PDT
Ended 11/15/99, 10:01:03 EST
Seller teevee@teevee.org (1)
(ask seller a question)
High bid cbsles (12)
Payment Cashiers check in U.S. dollars
Shipping Seller ships to home country only. No Canadians please.

Seller assumes all responsibility for listing this item. You should contact the seller to resolve any questions before bidding. Currency is U.S. dollar ($) unless otherwise noted.
Description

***HOT!!RARE!! NO RESERVE!!**

Television executives and producers-- THIS IS DESTINED TO BE ONE OF THE RAREST AND MOST SOUGHT AFTER ITEMS EVER-- an actual negro television writer!!! HE'S A REAL EYE-CATCHER AT PRESS CONFERENCES AND JUNKETS!!!! He's a limited edition collectable: there are only 55 in existence!!! He is the perfect accessory for the TV executive looking to dissuade boycotts from UNRULY CIVIL RIGHTS GROUPS!!! This could be your only chance to get one of these truely rare NEGROS as most are already in the hands of private collectors. Due to their quick sell out NEGROES like these are next to IMPOSSIBLE to find on the secondary market!

This big black buck has a strong constitution and a set of healthy teeth. He has been lovingly cared for in a smoke free environment. He has EXCELLENT ENUNCIATION SKILLS!!! if you didn't know any better you'd swear he was WHITE!!!

Despite the fact he is college educated, this isn't one of those UPPITY NEGROES-- he is WELL MANNERED and EAGER TO PLEASE. He understands the MAINSTREAM MARKET, but stil has an urban appeal.And how's this for a bonus, WHITE KIDS (14-24 yr.) love him!!!

This buck isn't one of those WATERED-DOWN MULATTOES OR OCTAROONS being passed off by unscrupulous sellers, we have certification from the Coalition of African American Television Writers declaring him as a FULL-BLOODED NEGRO!!! and he's PRICED TO MOVE!!! Don't let this once in a lifetime piece of memorabilia slip away. Satisfaction guaranteed or money refunded.

Good Luck with Bidding!

Bidding

JAMES COLLIER (Item #186293499)

Current bid $27,000,000
Bid increment $1,000,000

Copyright © 1999 tvBay Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.

The Least Popular Quarterback of All

Do you remember anything you learned in high school? I do.

For example, a puppet show demonstrating cellular mitosis, complete with "Love Theme from Cellular Mitosis," may not be the best way to get an A in biology. That staring at your feet, mumbling and blushing bright red every time you ask a girl out is not a recipe for success. And we mustn't forget that writing a story about Wilbert the Revolutionary Worm when you don't know the answer to the second essay question on the AP History test is not the recommended path to a passing score.

Of course, some of us also learned that writing an essay about Wilbert the Revolutionary Worm will, in fact, garner you a passing score on the AP History test.

But that's not the type of education you see on TV. No, from Dawson's Creek to Beverly Hills 90210 to Popular what you really learn about high school is that everyone there is beautiful and that given two girls, both equally likely to show up on the cover of Vogue, the brunette is the unpopular, ugly duckling.

But no matter how beautiful, popular and accomplished the lead female character is, she will invariably dump the chiseled quarterback with a chin dimple for the nebbish, deathly shy school newspaper editor once she finds out he's been in love with her since the third grade.

You know, just how it happens in real life.

Well, maybe not your lives. Apparently you readers have some issues with TV shows that purport to showcase those wonderfully painful years. Judging from the steaming pile of nearly three letters we've received about our review of the new WB melodrama Popular, teen-oriented series bring up some uncomfortable memories while reminding you of how TV high school qualifies as science fiction programming.

The cascade of e-mails had a recurring theme: how the good-looking girls all ignored the Toughskins-clad chess club captains and sweet, sensitive yearbook editors in order to go out with the loutish, brawny jock types who possessed table manners that would make a Neanderthal blush. Then when the popular girl found out you had been in love with her since the third grade, she slapped a restraining order on you.

As one of those demonized brawny jock types, let me respond: You chess club captains had it pretty good.

You say TV is unrealistic? Sure. After all, where's the awkward silence and teeth-gnashing agony when our hero discovers the popular girl he's just asked out -- solely on the basis of scuttlebutt that said popular girl is hopelessly in love with him -- is actually hot for a guy with the same first name and a last name that is an almost perfect homonym to his own?

But it wasn't supposed to be like that. My secondary school experience was supposed to be modeled after all those perfect dream lives you see on television. For I was that most celebrated, most blessed of teenagers.

I was a high school quarterback.

It all started out reasonably well. While I was a sophomore field general on the JV team, the varsity was led by a guy named John Erving, a senior that the vast majority of 10th grade males were in awe of. He looked like a soap opera's leading man, his parents were spectacularly rich, and he drove a Ford Bronco. But most of all, he made kissy-face with Susan Lange.

Susan was only a sophomore, but had already won universal acclaim as the most beautiful girl to ever walk the hallowed halls of our school. She was a soccer player, not a cheerleader, but other than that, John Erving was the perfect model of Hollywood's high school golden boy.

During our first game of that season, I injured my arm and had to drive to the hospital for X-rays. On the way out of the stadium, we passed the varsity warming up for their game later that night. Erving asked how I was feeling. It was unbelievable. He actually knew my name!

I had finally arrived! In a couple seasons, the sophomore guys were going to be in awe of me and I would be dating Susan Lange.

A couple games later, it was obvious that Erving sucked and he was benched. He and Susan broke up. She transferred out at the end of the year.

I turned a blind eye to all of this. TV wouldn't lie to me, would it? Two years later, everything would turn out all right. The Stanford, USC and Florida State recruiters would be fighting amongst themselves in the living room when Susan called to say she had returned for our senior year and, by the way, was I doing anything Friday night?

Junior season was much the same. The starting QB was a real popular guy and dated a gorgeous girl. He also was a lousy quarterback.

As a senior, I would live up to only one of those three precedents.

For some reason, the light generated from the popular kids didn't reach my particular high school social solar system until last Tuesday. And forget dating the cheerleaders, I was lucky if they even knew my name. When I'd drop back to pass the cheers would go something like "Don't throw another pick, Number 11!"

On the other hand, my offensive linemen, who evidently never read the Official Hierarchy of Football Position Sex Appeal, were very cool. They were the guys dating the cheerleaders and soccer players. One of them was the Homecoming King. All the while their quarterback, the guy they had sworn to take a bullet for when they recited the Oath of the Big Uglies, was reduced to putting a dress on the kitchen mop just so he would have a date for the Homecoming Dance.

Offensive linemen. For crying out loud, it's just not natural.

The stories you people send us always have a happy ending. Three days after being promoted to vice president, you run into the head cheerleader only to find her 50 pounds overweight, divorced from the alcoholic quarterback and trying to support a couple of rug rats while pulling down double shifts at the truck stop.

Victory over the cool kids is finally yours! This must be what Bill Gates feels like when he attends his high school reunions. Why doesn't TV show us that part?

How I envy you. A few months ago, I ran into a former cheerleader. I was surprised to learn she actually remembers me. I was further surprised by the fact that, a) she is more beautiful than ever, and b) she is engaged to a scrawny little Web Weasel, a man whose arms I could easily rip off and use to beat him to death. A man who celebrated the booming success of his IPO by asking her to marry him, thus scoring several hundred million dollars and one of the most gorgeous women in the world within a 12-hour period.

Revenge of the nerds, indeed. And I don't even get any empty, meaningless glory days to look back on during my night watchman's shift down at the cracker factory.

Somehow, I don't see my high school experience turning up on Dawson's Creek anytime soon, if for no other reason than I look a lot more like Richard Belzer than James Van Der Beek. That doesn't mean there isn't a place on TV for my life. I'm sure the producers of Freaks and Geeks are looking for some good stories, and "Love Theme from Cellular Mitosis" would make a snappy addition to any TV soundtrack.

Fall '99: "The West Wing"

The most sympathetic, likeable character in Aaron Sorkin's NBC drama The West Wing is a whore. And she's not even a regular.

In the series premiere, Sam Seaborn (Rob Lowe), speech writer, spends a night with a woman he meets at a bar. By means of a silly plot contrivance, we learn that the woman is a prostitute. This poses a problem for Seaborn. As a White House operative, a dalliance with a call girl could prove embarrassing to himself and his boss if word of it leaks to the press. (Lowe plays this most convincingly, knowing all too well the ins-and-outs political sex scandals.) As a world-saving do-gooder with a weakness for members of the fairer sex, Seaborn cannot resist the temptation of trying to save the woman from a life of exploitation.

But our '90s Jezebel does not want to be saved. "In my life, I have never committed a federal crime, which is more than I can say for some people in your line of work. I don't need saving... I like what I do and it's putting me through law school."

Unsentimental. Only a little pretentious. A bit self-righteous, sure, but then it wouldn't be an Aaron Sorkin production otherwise, now would it? There may even be a little truth in what she says. I wonder how much of it Sorkin believes? No matter. Such flourishes make an otherwise unwatchable show watchable.

The West Wing is typical of Sorkin's oeuvre: sanctimonious, affected, self-righteous. You want the truth? Sorkin's heroes and villains are not characters, but caricatures. Conservatives are the Dark Forces of Reaction -- one-dimensional, mouth-breathing troglodytes. The liberal heroes of the mythical administration are enlightened, smart, but debilitated in some way, often by a kind of hopeless romanticism. Their idealism makes them more "human."

The whore-redemption subplot has been set aside for the time being, as the first-term administration of President Josiah Bartlett (Martin Sheen) tackles other crises -- terrorism, gun control, and that pesky budget. His administration is righteous, but humane. It is progressive, with good-hearted people who know they are right and who are unafraid to use the massive power and might of the United States government to show it.

But the show really isn't about President Sheen. It's about his people -- who they are, what they do, how they make the White House go.

There is Chief of Staff Leo McGarry (John Spencer), who stakes his reputation and his marriage on a getting a gun-control bill passed. A compromise bill passes, Leo's wife leaves him anyway, and it's back to AA -- Leo is a recovering alcoholic, naturally -- located conveniently in the basement of Old Executive Office Building.

McGarry's deputy, Josh Lyman (Bradley Whitfield), has got problems of his own. His quick jibes earn land him in hot water with the mean Christian Right in the first episode. It doesn't help matters any that he is Jewish -- Sorkin uses that as an excuse to paint the moralizing antagonists as anti-semitic as well as ignorant. When a National Security Agency man gives him a card with instructions where to go in the event of a nuclear war, he suffers an existential crisis. I suppose many of us, placed in the same situation, would have pondered our place in the world, too. But only Sorkin could turn it into a meditation on Freudian psychology and childhood trauma.

Communications Director Toby Zeigler (Richard Schiff) is a liberal pain in the ass. Even the President doesn't like him very much. Press Secretary C.J. Cregg (Allison Janney) is the Harried Career Woman.

Then there is Charlie (Dule Hill), a young black man whose mother was a cop killed in the line of duty. He applies to be a White House messenger and ends up as President Bartlett's "body man." Why is he in this cast? Because NBC needed a black character in the show. Once it became clear that the NAACP and the National Council of La Raza weren't buying Marty Sheen nee Estevez as a Hispanic actor (hell, even Sheen wasn't buying it), something had to be done fast. And it shows.

The only truly believable character is Moira Kelly's mercenary political consultant Madeline Hampton. She's also the most contemptible, except for the others.

Much has been made -- by television critics, any way -- of Sorkin's idea of who or what President Bartlett is supposed to be: a melange of Teddy Roosevelt, JFK, and Gerald Ford with a dash of Reagan. The militaristic gesture in the second and third episodes, it's said, is supposed to be an attempt at "balance." When middle eastern terrorists shoot down an unarmed Air Force passenger jet carrying the President's physician, the commander-in-chief wants to respond by blowing said terrorists "off the face of the earth with the fury of God's thunder." Hey, who wouldn't? But somehow this, too, rings false. And who the hell cares about balance? Assuming a network would air an overtly conservative drama -- in an alternate universe, perhaps -- it would be terrible for the same reason the The West Wing is terrible.

And the reason is that Sorkin tries too hard. Nobody speaks the way his characters do. Most rapid-fire conversations aren't as snappy, and don't have such symmetry. And I don't think an episode has gone by without a little homily from the President at the end, explaining What We Have Learned.

And yet, as unbelievable as much of West Wing may be -- the characters, the dialogue, the plots -- the political sentiment driving these people is right on. Woodrow Wilson once said, "If I cannot retain my moral influence over a man except by occasionally knocking him down, if that is the only basis upon which he will respect me, then for the sake of his soul I have got occasionally to knock him down." That sums up the governing philosophy of nine-tenths of America's chief executives in the 20th century. If one thing rings true about The West Wing, that's it.

Dead Pool '99: Bringing Out the Dead

Casual readers of this Web site may get the impression that we have a rather low opinion of network TV executives. While meandering through our archives, readers will stumble across our vicious taunts of Warren Littlefield, our cruel gibes at the expense of Jamie Tarses, our crude puns heaping shame upon the good name of Scott Sasa, and they'll invariably reach the same conclusion: that we think the typical network executive is a two-faced weasel, a glad-handing empty suit with a tin ear for creativity and an aversion to anything that takes the slightest risk, a slack-jawed yes man with a jones for banality who shows the same lousy taste in programming that he does in his neckties.

Which is unfair, really. We've never made fun of their ties.

Besides, network executives are at least trying to set things right. Take this fall. Before one new show had even aired, the suits promised us this year would be different. They swore they learned from their past mistakes. Good ratings or bad, the new programs would have an honest chance at finding their footing, the executives said. No more itchy trigger fingers. No more mass cancellations before the first snowflake hit the ground. No more yanking shows halfway through the premiere episode and replacing them with "World's Funniest Gougings."

It should be noted at this point that TV executives also are spectacular liars. Because if they really learned from their past mistakes, then why on Earth were Nancy Travis and Kevin Pollak given another bite at the apple?

When it comes to TV, Travis and Pollak -- two otherwise perfectly wonderful people who have wronged God in no way -- have racked up a string of abrupt failures. Travis is best known for her stint on the sitcom Almost Perfect, a title full of more hope than truth. After eking out two seasons on CBS, Almost Perfect was banished to the USA Network, the place where short-lived sitcoms are sent to fill out the space between wrestling.

Pollak's tube-based career is no less spotty, the lone highlight being a one-year run as a recurring voice-over on The Drew Carey Show. Other than that, it's a handful of best-forgotten programs like Morton & Hayes, a blink-and-you-missed it sitcom that marked the start of Rob Reiner's descent into madness.

So it would seem that if you're a network executive and your goal is to actually convince viewers to watch your programs, the last two people you should turn to for help would be Nancy Travis and Kevin Pollak. If anything, you're leaving 8-by-10 glossies of the two with security and ordering them to shoot on sight.

But, just as those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it, those who green-lighted Meego are likely to make the same mistake twice. So CBS pulled off the ill-advised move of tapping both Nancy Travis and Kevin Pollak to star in the same show. In Work With Me, they would play a married couple who worked in the same office and got into one hilarious situation after another.

We should have spotted this disaster a mile away.

CBS gave the show all of four episodes to find its footing before sending Travis and Pollak off to continue their far more lucrative film careers. In place of Work With Me, get ready for repeats of your favorite CBS comedies, with the network's deepest hope that you won't notice the difference.

Just a day after Work With Me was left on the ash heap of history, Fox pulled off a double execution, axing Ryan Caulfield: Year One and Harsh Realm. After two airings of Ryan Caulfield and three installments of Harsh Realm, Fox apparently decided that both programs had found their audience -- which turned out to be next to nobody.

You may remember that Ryan Caulfield: Boy Policeman started life out as just Ryan Caulfield before changing its name to The Badland and then switching again to the woefully inaccurate Ryan Caulfield: Year One. This may mark the first time in history that a show has had more titles than air dates.

It hasn't been a particularly good autumn 'round Fox, where Action and Family Guy have already been put on hiatus and where ratings on most shows have dwindled to UPN-esque depths. Since he came on board too late to take any blame for OK'ing this train wreck, Fox chief Doug Herzog doesn't have to hire food tasters just yet. But as several out of work Los Angeles Dodger executives can attest, Rupert Murdoch is not widely known for his tolerance of failure.

How bad are things at Fox? The network has managed to pull off the rare, though not unheard of, feat of cancelling a program before a single episode airs. The victim, Manchester Prep, was reportedly a special kind of awful -- over-budget, behind schedule and tawdry enough to shame even the most unabashed libertine.

Think about that for a moment. What kind of swill must you have produced if Rupert Murdoch watches your first episode, looks around the room with a "Who farted?" expression and says, "Pass?"

Before you answer, it bears repeating that Fox is the network that wants to crash a jumbo jet in the middle of the desert as a sweeps month stunt.

(All that aside, we here at TeeVee have a special interest in getting our hands on the two completed, unaired Manchester Prep episodes. Why? Because television this awful must be seen to be believed. It's like "The Day the Clown Cried," that movie that Jerry Lewis starred in years and years ago about the Nazi Holocaust; you don't want to watch, but you dare not look away. So to all our unnamed readers out there with inside Hollywood connections -- your secret is safe with us, Dennis Boutsikaris! -- we beg you: Send us the Manchester Prep tape. A free T-shirt, an assortment of snacks and a kind thought from the likes of us will be your reward. Tapes of particularly filthy porno movies with the words Manchester Prep scrawled in magic marker also will be cheerfully accepted.)

Now those of you who picked Manchester Prep in our annual Dead Pool, you must be feeling pretty smug right now. Yes, the show you tabbed as roadkill did, in fact, give up the ghost. And yes, you should be congratulated for your TV savvy, your programming moxie, your skillful avoidance of the Shasta McNasty trap.

But wipe that grin off your face, Buster! Why? For starters, Shasta McNasty is still on the air, and that should be enough to put a hearty dose of The Fear into any right-thinking person. More important, though, the cancellation of Manchester Prep doesn't count for TeeVee Dead Pool purposes.

We refer you to the precedent-setting case of Scott Baio and his unlamented sitcom Rewind. Fox OK'd it in May, yanked it off the schedule in August and shot the last remaining copy of the pilot into space by October -- all without a single episode ever airing.

Did Rewind count in that year's Dead Pool? No. Nor did the similarly canned Hollyweird count last year. Nor will Manchester Prep count this year. Why? Because shows that never make it to the airwaves don't count in our crappy little contest.

Sorry, folks. We don't make the rules. Well, that's not true at all, actually. We do make the rules. But we're not the addle-brained network who rained on your parade by throwing in the towel on Manchester Prep before the opening bell, are we? Your beef's with Fox, not us.

Maybe Doug Herzog should hire those food tasters after all.

So in the end, the Dead Pool went down like this:

FIRST TO GO: The Mike O' Malley Show
SECOND TO GO: Work With Me
THIRD TO GO: (tie) Ryan Caulfield: Year One and Harsh Realm

Readers Juliana Duffy and Shawn MacFarlane jumped out to an early lead by correctly identifying Mike O'Malley as the season's first casualty. As for the rest... well, they whiffed. Neither Julia nor Shawn identified any of the other shows to get the axe. Still, their foresight in identifying Mike O'Malley's doomed opus was enough to hold off a furious challenge by reader David MacDonald, who finished in second.

So that means the vaunted TeeVee Dead Pool title would come down to a tiebreaker: the date that the first show would be sent out to pasture.

Only Julia didn't submit a tiebreaker with her entry. And Shawn didn't either.

OK, so Julia and Shawn couldn't be bothered to read our rules. Fine. Then they surely won't be bothered when we don't give the prize to either of them. We're sticklers for propriety at TeeVee, and we could do a lot worse than declare that David MacDonald had won the Dead Pool by correctly identifying Work With Me as the second show to get canceled while also including Mike O'Malley in his top three picks.

The problem is, David didn't include the tiebreaker date, either.

Let's go back in time for a second, to the article where we outlined the rules for the Dead Pool. Pay specific attention to the part that says:

Include the date you think the first show will be sent back to mama in a pine box: That's what we in the contest biz call our tie-breaker.

Which leads us to ask a simple question: What is so goddamn difficult to comprehend about that sentence? Is it the colon that's throwing you off, the monosyllabic words, the light and breezy writing style? Really -- do you people actually read our site? Or do you just sort of skim along, mouthing out the important words until you've gotten the gist of it?

Pat Buchanan is right: This country's landed right in the crapper. People can't run a simple Internet contest without it looking more crooked than a Mike Tyson fight. Our schools are churning out progressively stupider kids who listen to increasingly awful music. Women's fashions are appalling, and you can't get a good cup of coffee any more for under a buck. And it's all the fault of the pinkos. The pinkos and the Canadians and the Freemasons who subvert the rule of law and tear at the thin fabric of decency that keeps us from devolving into chaos.

Goddamn you people! Goddamn you all!

Hmmm? Oh, the contest! Right. Um, Juliana Duffy, Shawn MacFarlane and David MacDonald: You all win T-shirts. Congratulations. You deserve it.

Bastards.

The Showrunners Runneth Over

When one hears the phrase "showrunner," one thinks of:

a. an elaborate tablecloth on Mother's dining table
b. a flamboyant 4X400 relay team member
c. the person responsible for shepherding script, actors, and other assorted elements required to out a television show every week

While it might be fun to discuss fabulously befrocked track stars, this is a site about television, so we're going with answer C. A new book, The Showrunners by David Wild, attempts to give non-showbiz insiders a look at the juggling duties that comprise the average showrunner's job.

The very nature of the job, as the book makes clear, is difficult to pin down: showrunners can be writers or producers, engaged in everything from scheduling wrangles with Scott Sassa to last-minute rewrites with the Friends writing team. Showrunners cast pilots, sell shows to networks, sweat location logistics, write scripts, make final edits, coddle actors (hilariously dismissed by Will & Grace's showrunner Max Mutchnik as "silly people"), fire writers, and somehow find time to track and maintain the creative vision driving the show. Lest we forget, if given a moment to surf the Web, they'll only find a bunch of snotty TV-themed Web sites featuring items written by people who just don't understand how hard it is to do what they do.

It's a job only a masochist could love, and the book illustrates that abundantly, trotting out vignette after vignette about 20-hour days, divorces, and sudden career devastation.

But the book's not about recruiting people for a life in showrunning; it's about being a showrunner. Structured in a series of chapters meant to mimic the lifecycle of a show during a single television season, The Show Runners attempts to follow the runners at shows as diverse as 7th Heaven, NewsRadio, South Park and Party of Five over the 1998-1999 season.

I say attempts because the book's reach far exceeds what it grasps. Wild has strung together vignettes from 7th Heaven, Cupid, Dilbert, Everybody Loves Raymond, Friends, It's Like, You Know ..., Jesse, NewsRadio, Norm, Overseas, Party of Five, Seven Days, Snoops, South Park, Time of Your Life, Veronica's Closet, and Will & Grace, and attempts to use the different stories to illustrate the very different fortunes awaiting shows and showrunners each season. It's a Hollywood take on the noir contention that there are eight million stories in the Naked City.

Unfortunately, the sheer volume of the show list prevents any of those stories from being substantive or compelling; trying to follow the slender thread of an individual show's tale through anecdote after unrelated anecdote is tiring, and the rewards one reaps for doing so are slim relative to the amount of effort required to keep all the stories straight.

The seasonal structure doesn't help matters. While it's true that some shows' fortunes rise or fall on sweeps, not every show's story fits so neatly into the artifically imposed calendar. The real drama on Everybody Loves Raymond last year was hiding Patricia Heaton's pregnancy, then writing around Peter Boyle's heart attack. Neither happened in a sweeps month, and the hair-pulling effort to sustain the show's momentum is diluted because of the book's uneven structure.

No two television shows are alike, and each of the shows was included to illustrate a different facet of show business. But none of the shows illustrates any one point particularly well. This book could have used some serious editorial pruning and reorganization. For example, the sections on Friends product team Kaufmann/Bright/Crane all mention that the trio is overextended from trying to sustain one network star and nurture two weaker sitcom properties (Veronica's Closet and Jesse.) A similar tale unfolds with the Keyser/Lippman team behind Party of Five, the failed Relativity and the drastically revamped Time of Your Life, and there's passing mention of increasingly overbooked David E. Kelley and Snoops. So why not simply focus on the Kaufmann/Bright/Crane story, explore how show runners are now brand name franchises, and follow the trials of trying to recapture lightning in a bottle with each successive show? One well-researched, meaty case study would be far more entertaining than a series of connect-the-dots anecdotes.

In addition to a lack of focus, the book also suffers from flat writing and repetitive phrasing. Actresses Courteney Cox and Jennifer Aniston are both described, within paragraphs of each other, as "incredibly slender," whereas Matthew Perry is constantly labeled "funny." Not only do these labels tell us nothing new, they're dull. Coming as he does from a reporting background, Wild may be following an old journalism rule -- eschewing adjectives and adverbs for descriptive nouns and verbs -- but he's not writing for the typical newspaper audience, so there's no reason to keep the word choices confined to a fifth-grade level.

That's not to say the book is a complete waste of time. Finding out that the producers of Everybody Loves Raymond feed their studio audiences dinner during tapings is the kind of charming detail that one wouldn't know from watching the show. Reading the banter between The NewsRadio cast and the invited audience at a Museum of Television and Radio event is almost as good as being there, especially after an A.M. radio reporter responds to Dave Foley's ribbing with the catty remark: "You're right... but at least I have a job next year." Learning how very much showrunners and network types hate the June network kickoffs and subsequent summer press tours is also engaging: it's always fun to find out what crosses each industry asks its members to bear.

But these isolated moments do little to help lift the book's fragmented story arcs. The Showrunners is billed as a behind-the-scenes look at how the shows we see get on the air, but the reader is taken past those scenes at a dead sprint. If this book is a behind-the-scenes look at showrunning, you might as well argue that jogging on a treadmill is a behind-the-scenes look at Olympic training. Any track star can tell you that ain't so; I'm here to tell you the Showrunners, while superficially amusing, isn't anything like the book it's billed to be. That's a shame: unraveling the web of behind-the-scenes tasks and decisions, suprises and crises could have made for a truly informative and entertaining read.

Don't Blink

If there's one thing that this country has learned from the Clinton Administration, it's this: we don't want a President who gives us the willies.

The whole cigar thing has sent enough shivers marching up and down our collective spines to last a lifetime. We, as a nation, are tired of wanting to take a shower. We'll settle for pretty much anybody these days -- druggies, felons, people from Texas -- just, please, nobody creepy.

Which is, of course, why Steve Forbes -- publisher, multi-millionaire, candidate for the Republican nomination -- doesn't stand a chance.

The man emanates Strange Neighbor rays. He's probably got his windows covered with tinfoil. I'd bet five bucks that stray cats have learned not to hang around his house. If you catch my drift. Creepy, near as I can tell, is just about the only thing Forbes does well.

And creepy, unfortunately for Forbes, comes across very, very well on television.

TV may not be able to pick up the subtler qualities that go into leadership -- moral character, a vision for the future, that crap -- but it loves the superficial gloss. Majestic backdrops and snappy soundbites have overwhelmed American politics because they come across so well on the tube. If TV can effectively communicate anything about potential leaders of the free world -- aside from the fact that they have wildly inappropriate ideas about what constitutes an effective humidor -- it's basically this:

  • I'm tall.
  • I have good hair.
  • I'm not creepy.
And while Forbes is tall enough and has passable hair, he's just about the creepiest thing to show up in the American living room since that liver-eatin' stretchy guy from the first season of The X-Files.

For instance, the man blinks too much.

I mean, way too much. It's unnerving. And even if you don't consciously notice it, it will set you on edge. In the age of televised everything, a candidate who can't look into the camera and not make his audience shiver had better start making lecture tour arrangements with Michael Dukakis, because he's not going to be getting a promotion any time soon.

Recently, Forbes was interviewed on Party Down with Sam and Cokie and managed to put any epileptics in the audience in seizures. He looked like he was trying to get a Morse code message out past his captors. He could have given nervous tic lessons to people suffering through heroin withdrawal.

Of course, there's a perfectly logical explanation for Forbes' behavior: he's suffering through heroin withdrawal.

Ha ha! Just a little joke. To my knowledge, Mr. Forbes has never taken illegal drugs, save walking into his bank vault and inhaling deeply. No, Forbes' behavior has a much more sensible explanation, one that's not only backed up by facts but makes an eerie amount of sense when you think about it:

He's a robot controlled by a pack of squirrels.

And squirrels that don't quite have the controls down yet. Forbes was talking to Sam and/or Cokie -- I've stopped being able to tell them apart -- and blinking up a storm and yet he managed to seem oddly disconnected. Not only were the words that came out of his mouth totally pre-packaged -- it's well-known that squirrels can't think on their feet -- but he would occasionally list slightly to the side when the squirrel responsible for his inner-ear would become distracted by George Stephanopolous' thick head of nesting hair.

This theory also explains why he always looks like he's got nuts hidden in his cheeks.

Not that I'm unsympathetic. Squirrel-controlled robot or no, the ability to calmly stare into the eerie, unblinking eye of national television coverage would leave me a nervous wreck, too. But I'm not running for president. I'm not trying to convince anybody to let me keep my sweaty, twitching finger on the nuclear button. I, basically, am not trying to talk enough people in to trusting me long enough for me to get into office and start the Glorious Squirrel Revolution.

Unlike Forbes, I'm not failing at it, either.

The best strategy for Forbes at this point is probably to simply admit the truth and come out of the, um, little hole in the tree. He should play it up, even -- hold a nationally televised press conference wherein his head opens up and Napoleon and Snowball, the two head squirrels, emerge to greet a phalanx of cameras. They could wave, say they want to get on with the business of the country, then duck back inside.

And that would be the end of it. Poof! The American people have had much worse things inhabit the Oval Office than a pack of squirrels and we would undoubtedly find the honesty refreshing.

Plus, squirrels are cute. Spaced-out multi-millionaires with delusions of global domination are creepy. Guess which comes across better on TV?

Categories

Monthly Archives

Pages

Powered by Movable Type 4.25

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from November 1999 listed from newest to oldest.

October 1999 is the previous archive.

December 1999 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.