May 2005 Archives

Lose the Laugh Track, Cheap Seats

I used to love the ESPN Classic show Cheap Seats because it felt like l'esprit du divan, the living-room heckler's way adding a little humor to a sports spectacle. Given that the broadcasts of most sporting events are impregnated with a gravitas that is wholly inappropriate for what's actually on screen, something like Cheap Seats was necessary. It validates the sane person's contention that some contests are too stupid to be regarded without commentary. And like the best l'esprit du divan, it counted on the audience to get the joke.

Note how I'm writing this all in the past tense: some genius attached to the show has imposed a live audience and a laugh track on what was once a clubby little set-up: Randy and Jason, a couch and a lot of terrible "sports" footage worthy of The Ocho. The previous show: a half-hour concoction guaranteed to make viewers feel as though they were in on the Sklar brothers' jokes. The current show: bedizened with cues telling us to laugh, drones, laugh when some anonymous crowd tells us to. With just two cheap gimmicks, the show has sent its viewers two messages: we don't trust you to know what's funny, and we don't like it when you decide what you think about sports spectacles.

I'm still watching Cheap Seats, because I still have hope that someone associated with that show will tell the laugh-track advocates to shove their braying interlopers where the sun doesn't shine. But I'm not terribly hopeful about an organization that's so insecure about the quality of their product -- sports broadcasting -- that they have to neuter even the joking reactions to it.

Lost Explained!

Today, while driving — driving and showering always bring out the most thoughtful in me — I finally unravelled what’s going on in everyone’s favorite conundrum, Lost.

All of the characters in Lost are in Zork. The whole show is one giant text adventure game.

Think about it.

LOST> take gun

You take the gun.

LOST> n

You head north into the jungle, soon emerging into a small clearing. There is something gleaming under the dirt.

LOST> dig

What do you want to dig?

LOST> dig dirt

What do you want to dig the dirt with?

LOST> dig dirt with plane-scrap shovel

You dig in the dirt. Several sweaty minutes later, you reveal a steel hatch.

LOST> open hatch

The hatch cannot be opened from this side.

LOST> use dynamite

There is no dynamite here.

LOST> n

You are lost in the jungle in a maze of twisty little paths, all alike.

LOST> e

You are lost in the jungle in a maze of twisty little paths, all alike.

LOST> n

You are lost in the jungle in a maze of twisty little paths, all alike.

Locke is here.

Locke walks off to the west.

LOST> follow locke

You follow Locke.

You are lost in the jungle in a maze of twisty little paths, all alike.

Locke walks off to the north.

LOST> follow locke

You follow Locke.

You are lost in the jungle in a maze of twisty little paths, all alike.

Locke walks off to the north.

LOST> follow locke

You follow Locke.

You emerge from the jungle and see ahead of you a huge sailing ship overgrown with vines. There is a hole in its underside large enough for a person to walk through.

Locke is here.

Hurley is here.

Kate is here. Kate is HOT.

Arzt is here.

An open crate of sweating dynamite is here.

LOST> look kate

Kate is just standing there being HOT.

LOST> look crate

Inside the wooden crate you see many sticks of dynamite, encrusted with nitroglycerin, packed in straw.

Arzt says, "Do you know what happens to dynamite in tropical weather? It sweats nitroglycerin. Nitroglycerin is the most unstable chemical known to man."

Suddenly, Arzt explodes.

LOST> take arzt

The little pieces aren't big enough.

LOST> take dynamite

The crate is too big.

LOST> take stick

You take a stick of dynamite. It feels unstable.

LOST> i

You are carrying:
     a plane-scrap shovel
     a backpack
     an empty water bottle
     no tea
     a small metal toy plane
     a gun
     some Arzt on your neck
     an unstable stick of dynamite

LOST> give kate plane

"This is important to me, but I don't need it yet," Kate says, handing the plane back to you.

You take the small metal plane of importance to Kate.

LOST> l stick

The dynamite is getting very unstable. You'd better hurry.

Locke says, "I'm going back to the hatch."

Locke walks off to the west.

LOST> follow locke

You follow Locke back to the hatch.

LOST> drop dynamite

You drop the dynamite. It looks very unstable! You'd better run!

LOST> run

Which way?

LOST> run s

You run south.

You are on the beach.

Locke is here.

That dim bulb Shannon is here.

You hear a huge explosion from the north.

LOST> n

You head north into the jungle, soon emerging into a small clearing. There is a hatch here.

The hatch is open.

LOST> l hatch

You see a rusty, ancient ladder going down into the darkness. After several rungs, the ladder is broken, and the rest of the shaft goes down as far as you can see.

LOST> q

You can't quit.

LOST> die

I don't know the word "die".

LOST> kill self

What do you want to kill the self with?

LOST> kill self with gun

You raise the weapon to your head, close your eyes tightly, and begin to squeeze the trigger. Suddenly, Hurley jumps out of hiding and pulls the barrel away from your temple. "Dude, what are you doing?" he shouts.

LOST>

Lost and Found

Like Chris Rywalt, my enthusiasm for Lost had diminished somewhat from its heady early episodes. However, the past few weeks have definitely given me the sense that major plot machinery was kicking into gear -- that the show's writers suddenly knew where they are going to be heading next season, and having a strong imperative to drive us to a season-ending cliffhanger.

And what a cliffhanger last night's episode was. No, it didn't reveal any of the show's secrets, but it did drizzle in some new information, ask several new questions, and most importantly, creep me out. ("The numbers are bad!")

The other week I was on a radio show, and the interviewer asked me what the best show on TV right now is. Lost was my answer, and after seeing its whiz-bang finale, I don't regret that answer at all. It's the best season-ender I've seen since the second year of Alias. I can't wait for the second season of Lost... but first I'm going to watch the finale again.

2005 Fall Schedules: At NBC, Failure Is an Option

I’m afraid I have what will likely be a sad announcement for an infinitesimal percentage of our readership — this is the last article I’m ever writing for TeeVee. Yes, it’s been one crazy nine-year ride filled with highs and lows and many, many complaints about spelling errors. And the unceasing, fruitless “Save Our Show” e-mails — I’ll treasure those in my heart always.

It’s nothing negative about TeeVee that’s prompting me to leave. Sure, I would have liked to be paid with something other than expired coupons for McDonald’s shakes at some point in the last nine years. And I never appreciated it on those few occasions when I turned in a substandard article and Snell would slap a “Ben Boychuk” byline on it — I mean, let’s not insult our readers’ intelligence by resorting to obviously fake pseudonyms. But I’m leaving here on good terms; at least, that’s what I’ve told Snell that I said in my exit interview.

No, I’m leaving TeeVee because the demands of the job have just gotten to be too much for me — turn things in on time, make sure everything’s spelled properly, don’t just make stuff up when you’re too lazy to look them up on Google. Really — who needs that kind of hassle? Instead of this hectic, fast-paced job, I want a gig where little is asked and even less is expected. I want to work for an employer that simply wants me to show up each morning, keep a seat warm, and not pocket too many office supplies before I punch out promptly at 5 p.m. And, if on occasion I should blunder spectacularly, my ideal employer wouldn’t so much as say “boo” — if anything, I’d expect a reassuring pat on the back and a generous bonus. In short, I’m hoping to land a gig where sustained mediocrity is considered to be the gold standard and colossal screw-ups are dismissed as no biggie.

Which means that I hope NBC is hiring.

I figure there’s no plausible reason — other than a high tolerance for failure and a healthy appreciation for inertia — to explain why we aren’t witnessing a mass exodus of disgraced programming executives from 30 Rockefeller Center. Consider the year that NBC just had: it plummeted from first place to fourth place among networks, with only the WB and UPN to break the fall. It fiddled while two of its flagship shows — Friends and Frasier — took their long-overdue curtain calls and failed to replace them with hits of equal or greater value. In fact, of the eight shows NBC introduced in this space last year, just two will be back for seconds in the fall — with Joey picked up for a second year only to keep Matt LeBlanc away from the cutlery in the NBC commissary.

If you or I turned in a performance like that at work, we’d be hastily flinging our personal effects into a cardboard box as security made a beeline for our cubicle. So obviously, the higher-ups at GE are busily cutting the brake line on NBC/Universal Television Group president Jeff Zucker’s car and debating the exact amount of scotch to pour down his throat so that the authorities will buy whatever happens as an accident, right?

Nope, Zucker’s still gainfully employed. And despite his best efforts to appear humbled by his network’s spectacular flameout — “We’re not where you want us to be,” he told advertisers at last week’s upfronts. “We get it.” — he’s still spouting off patently ridiculous things, like this quote in The New York Times:

“As I’m sitting there now and watching Full House with my kids, I’m thinking two things,” Mr. Zucker said. “First, that I can’t believe this was a humongous hit. Second, that I know we have shows that are as funny as this.”

Dare to dream big, my man.

It isn’t as if Zucker has a tremendous track record of success, something that would make you dismiss this past season’s performance as an aberration instead of the inevitable result after years of squandered opportunity. He took over programming duties for the Peacock Network in December 2000. The major hits that have aired on NBC during Zucker’s tenure — your ERs, your West Wings, your Wills & Graces — were introduced under his predecessors. Zucker can claim credit for… well, let’s let his NBC biography damn him with faint praise:

Zucker put his mark on the network with such successes as Las Vegas, Law & Order: Criminal Intent, and The Apprentice.

As far as legacies go, that’s like being voted “Most Likely to Continue Drawing Breath” in your senior-class yearbook. Both creatively and financially, Las Vegas and Criminal Intent are modest successes at best. And The Apprentice fell into Zucker’s lap after even more incompetent executives at ABC took a pass on the project.

So what’s Zucker’s solution to turn around NBC’s woes next fall? Not surprisingly, it relies heavily on trotting out the same ol’ same old and hoping that the situation fixes itself.

Start with Will & Grace, which returns for what seems like its 20th consecutive final season. I could have sworn going to a movie theater last fall and sitting through a Will & Grace commercial featuring a tinkly piano playing a melancholy version of “One for the Road,” suggesting that Debra Messing was dying of a rare disease and that Eric McCormack was being shipped off to the front in the morning — or at least that Will & Grace would wrap things up by the summer. But apparently Jeff Zucker desperately waving around a large check convinced the show’s producers that the straight-woman-and-gay-man-are-best-friends-forever plotline has a few more stories in it. Anything to avoid coming up with another idea for a show, I guess.

Preceding Will & Grace on Thursday nights is the aforementioned disappointment Joey. Those of you who clicked through to the New York Times article linked to up above may recognized both of these shows as the ones blamed for torpedoing The Apprentice’s ratings. Naturally, they’ll be back in front of The Apprentice next fall.

In other perplexing sitcom moves, Scrubs — easily the best show on NBC right now, which is actually more of a compliment than it sounds like — is nowhere to be found on the fall schedule. NBC hasn’t cancelled the show, mind you — it’s just holding back Scrubs as a midseason replacement for when one or all of its other series inevitably fail. Because when you’re a struggling network in a ratings free-fall, the one thing you want to make sure to do is keep those successful shows out of the public eye for as long as possible.

As proof that laughter isn’t something you hear much of in the halls of NBC these days, the network has only one new sitcom planned for the fall schedule — My Name is Earl, in which Jason Lee plays a scruffy loser who wins the lottery and decides to turn his life around. While this sounds like a premise that could maybe sustain three or four episodes at most — again, not a major drawback considering the shelf life new shows normally enjoy on the Peacock Network — reliable sources who attended NBC’s upfront presentation say that the clips from My Name is Earl suggest that the show is very, very funny.

Those same reliable sources said the same thing about the clips from Joey shown at last year’s upfronts, incidentally.

As for dramas, ER and its rotating cast of 730 people, all of whom have been added during the last two seasons, will return to its customary 10 p.m.-on-Thursday time slot. West Wing moves to Sunday nights, with the likelihood that President Sheen will soon give way to either Hawkeye Pierce or Victor Sifuentes. The political drama takes the place of American Dreams, which NBC cancelled. Guess we’ll never find out how the ’60s ended. (Hint: Badly.) Joining American Dreams in the scrap-pile are the long-cancelled LAX and Hawaii and the freshly shitcanned Revelations and Law & Order: Trial by Jury. That latter cancellation is significant, as it marks the first time that NBC’s Law & Order copy machine has suffered a significant paper jam. For a programmer whose response to even modest successes is “Get me five more shows just like that,” the apparent running-dry of the Law & Order well removes a significant tool from Zucker’s arsenal.

So what joins ER, West Wing, Crossing Jordan, the three surviving members of the Law & Order franchise, the not-as-terrible-as-you-might-expect-from-the-Profiler-like-premise Medium, and the exactly-as-terrible-as-you-feared Las Vegas in NBC’s dramatic lineup next fall? First up is E-Ring, a Wednesday night drama that promises to take our minds off those troubling headlines about the unending war against terror with ripped-from-the-headlines plotlines about the unending war against terror. On Sunday night, there’s a soapy medical drama set in and around a fertility clinic called Inconceivable, which sounds a lot more entertaining if you imagine the Wallace Shawn character from The Princess Bride saying the title of the program. Also, this figures to be one of the first network programs in which masturbation is a recurring plot point — especially now that ABC didn’t pick up the sitcom Joel Stein was working on. Finally, Monday nights will showcase Fathom, a spooky, weird-things-is-happenin’ show in the vein of Lost that poses this question in the press release announcing its launch.

Ever wonder what life would be like if a new form of sea life began to appear in locales all over the earth?

You know… I haven’t wondered that. Not at all. Let’s move on.

On the reality front, The Biggest Loser — so named because NBC deemed that Laugh at Fatty, America was too cruel — returns. It’s joined by Three Wishes, since NBC apparently noticed the terrific success enjoyed by Extreme Makeover: Home Edition and decided Red State America couldn’t get enough of sob stories in which down-on-their-luck folk are showered with trinkets and baubles by TV personalities. Assuming the Ty Pennington role of benevolent TV sugar daddy in this production — hopefully with much less mugging for the camera — is banal pop songstress Amy Grant.

“Everyone secretly wants the chance to fulfill a lifelong wish that seems beyond their grasp — and this show will help transform those dreams into a life-changing reality,” says NBC Universal Cable Entertainment & Cross-Platform Strategy Jeff Gaspin in the press release trumpeting the existence Three Wishes. You couldn’t be more right, Jeff. Here are my three wishes, just in case Amy Grant plans on stopping by the Casa de Michaels anytime soon: 1) I hope you brought bourbon and Davidoffs. 2) Do you think you could get the Oakland A’s some right-handed power hitting? 3) Please burn all remaining copies of “Baby Baby.”

But you know… I just can’t shake the sinking suspicion that I’ve heard of this show somewhere before. Even the title seems familiar — like it’s the sort of thing some group of wisenheimers would think up for an April Fool’s Day parody of reality TV. Oh… goddamnit!

Zucker, you lazy bastard — the least you could have done is change the title. You’re really lucky we have terrible legal representation.

The Apprentice will be back, of course. Whether its audience comes back, too, is another question entirely. As mentioned above, The Apprentice lost viewers last season — about seven million of them, according to the Times. And while some of that can be laid at the feet of its drab lead-ins, it’s also worth considering that perhaps The Apprentice is suffering the same fate as all reality shows not named Survivor or The Amazing Race — after the first or second go-round things can get a little stale. There’s only so many ways you can fire people, after all — at least, not without a major overhaul of this country’s labor laws and a really comprehensive liability waiver.

“Mr. Trump, have you decided which one of us apprentices you’re going to fire this week?”

“I’d like to answer your question with a question, if I may: have you ever heard of a game called Russian Roulette?”

So what do you do when one of your flagship shows loses some of its luster? Tweak the premise to keep things fresh? Pull it off the air until mid-season in the hopes that absence makes the heart grow fonder?

Maybe you do — unless you’re employed by NBC, in which case your only course of action is to produce a second version of your flagging program. After all, it’s that same strategy that got the once almighty Who Wants to Be a Millionaire where it is today — over-exposed, cancelled and airing in perpetuity on cable right after Match Game ‘79.

And so this fall, America will have the opportunity to not only shower the original Apprentice with its growing indifference. On Wednesdays at 8, we’ll also have the chance to get sick of the sight of The Apprentice: Martha Stewart.

I don’t doubt the first Apprentice spinoff featuring the disgraced domestic goddess will enjoy an early surge of viewership thanks to the undeniable train-wreck factor — Is this the week Martha shows us how to decorate for a prison wedding? How to craft a shiv out of an old pinecone? Or is she just going to snap this week and start screaming “Back off, bitches,” at the contestants? — but I suspect, it will turn out to be the kind of abject failure most NBC-backed ventures eventually become. And this time next year, when viewers are hurling their TVs out of third-story windows to avoid watching the inevitable Apprentice-Joey cross-over episode and NBC is being out-polled by informercials on Pax, I fully expect Jeff Zucker to appear at another upfront session unscathed with another bold plan to lead NBC back to the glory days of mediocrity.

May his reign last for a thousand years.

Lost on Lost

So tonight is the season finale of Lost and I must admit: I'm getting a little tired of the show. I've loved it a lot so far, but with the last few episodes, I've realized I had this feeling before, only back then it was called The X-Files. I'm bored with seeing flashbacks, most of which haven't told us anything recently, and I'm getting increasingly fed up with the show's way of spinning out plot thread after plot thread without bothering to tie up any of the old ones. I mean, it's like they simply never want to answer a question. The whole show can be boiled down to this (and I'm going to insert a spolier warning here, although a) I doubt very much that anyone can give anything away about this show since it makes no sense whatsoever and b) if you haven't caught up by now but you still plan on watching it, you're very pathetic):

 A bunch of people miraculously survive a plane crash on a tropical island.

 How did they survive? Why?

 The pilot just got eaten by a giant monster!

 A giant monster? What is it? How did it get there?

 There's a transmitter on the island!

 What's powering it? Why is it there?

 The dog lived!

 Huh? How did it manage that?

 Locke used to be paralyzed, and now he isn't!

 Did the island do that? Something about the crash? How did that happen?

 Hey, fresh water!

 Um, right.

 And mummified bodies!

 Of who?

 Someone knocked out Sayid while he was looking for the source of the transmission!

 Who? Why?

 Sayid found some crazy French chick in the jungle!

 Crazy French chick? Why is she crazy? What the fuck?

 A psychic predicted the crash to Claire!

 A psychic? You mean they're not all fakes?

 Ethan wasn't on the plane!

 Wait a second. Then how did he get there? What's he doing?

 Charlie's been killed! No, wait, he's still alive.

 Why isn't he dead? Is it because he was in that Lord of the Rings movie?

 Look, a locked briefcase. And a hatch.

 A hatch? What the fucking fuck?

 Oh, wait, the island, it also manufactures hallucinations.

 It does? How? Why?

 Another polar bear!

 Crap. Where did this one come from?

 And Walt has magic powers.

 Why? What can he do? What has this got to do with ANYTHING?

 Claire's back.

 What happened to her while she was away?

 Sawyer's hearing voices. And there's this boar which is really pissed at him.

 Voices? Intelligent boar? What next?

 Hurley won the lottery before the crash. And his numbers are printed on the side of the hatch.

 Uh huh. Why are there numbers on there? How is this all connected?

 There's another plane crashed on the island.

 Another plane. How did it get there? Why is it still there?

 The hatch lights up!

 What the fucking fuck, I mean, fuck!

 And Locke was the one who whomped Sayid on the head way back. Feels like years ago, don't it?

 Why would Locke do that?

 The French lady is back. The Others are coming!

 Double crap. Who are the Others?

 The Black Rock is a sailing ship!

 Okaaaaay. How did it get there? Why do we care?

 The end.

Good luck with tonight's episode, everyone. And God bless.

2005 Fall Schedules: The WB

Here's what I don't understand about The WB's fall schedule. Well, there are actually several things I don't get, starting with "Who watches this stuff?" and working down to "Seriously, there are people tuning in for this stuff?" But the specific thing that, for me, passeth all understanding is the way they've got their Friday schedule set up.

It starts with an hour of Reba reruns. Apparently, those of you who picked it to win the 2001 Dead Pool were misinformed, as it's now charging into its fifth season with a new show on Fridays and two reruns on Sundays. And later on Sunday, they've got Blue Collar TV, on which Jeff Foxworthy, Bill Engvall, and Larry the Cable Guy romp around while the audience tries to remember if there wasn't a fourth guy in the Blue Collar Franchise at some point. So far, no problem. But crammed in between Reba and the Foxworthy Gang is... Charmed. And maybe it's just me, but it seems like the demographic for a sitcom starring a country singer and the demographic for a sketch comedy show starring rednecks are roughly the same, but is that the same people who want to watch pert young witches? I would hypothesize that it is not, and that perhaps the WB would be better served by putting, say, something more Southern in that slot.

And yes, I realize that this is the time slot things are already in. Too bad. I'm commenting about it now. See, they could take Charmed and put it back-to-back with their new Supernatural show. It stars Jared Padelecki (whom you might remember as Dean from Gilmore Girls) and Jensen Ackles (who was on Smallville as someone called Jason Teague, although I personally don't remember him) as brothers who drive around in a '67 Chevy Impala searching for their missing father.

But it's not all deadbeat dads on Supernatural -- they also hunt down evil monsters! You might think it sounds silly to have a show in which two guys drive aimlessly around the country and battle ghosts, and you'd be correct. The WB is hoping to distract you from that fact by reminding you that they've done spooky shows before. Some might find it a bit odd that they brag about Buffy the Vampire Slayer when they let that show fly away to UPN. But I guess they know what they're doing.

Another new show I was worried about at first was Just Legal -- I just don't think the world is ready for Barely Legal: the Series on network television. And you'll note how I'm not doing a joke about how the WB isn't really a "network." I'm saving that one for UPN. Anyway, this one is a show about a nineteen-year-old lawyer who can't get any work because he's so young. Naturally, he hooks up with a broken-down old ambulance-chasing lawyer played by Don Johnson, because that's what you do in this sort of situation. And then they become, if I might quote from the WB press release, "defenders of the accused and crusaders for the unjustly wronged." Come to think of it, it's not Barely Legal: the Series, but that doesn't mean it can't still be terrible.

Speaking of bad shows (which is a segue that tends to be used a lot this time of year), Related is a lot like The Odd Couple, but with four people, who are all hot chicks. You've got your 19-year-old college student who just switched her major from "pre-med" to "experimental theater." You've got your event coordinator who has to deal with demanding celebrities (who will, I suspect, be exactly as famous as "people who need to cameo on a WB show to promote a new project"). There's a corporate lawyer. And there's a legal-aid lawyer, who is listed as "TBD" in the press release but appears to be Laura San Giacomo in the pictures. Apparently, she's going from "young and idealistic" in Just Shoot Me to "mothering and idealistic". I was going to wonder why she was jumping all the way up to a 33-year-old character, but IMDB says she's actually 43.

And then there's Twins, which is based on the well-known comedic principle of putting two dissimilar people next to each other and saying, "Look! They're not very similar at all!" In this case, you've got a lingerie model (Molly Stanton, who used to be on Passions) and a successful businesswoman (Sara Gilbert, who was the best part of Roseanne). It seems they get into all sorts of conflicts which have to moderated (or something) by their parents, Mark Linn-Baker (Perfect Strangers and My Favorite Year, which was a really good movie) and Melanie Griffith (well, I'm sure you know who Melanie Griffith is). The gimmick is that the smart twin takes after their father (because we all know that smart people aren't as attractive as idiots) and the model takes after their mother. I'm assuming that heartwarming hilarity will ensue, although I honestly can't see how.

I'd list the WB shows that aren't returning, but except for Jack and Bobby, I don't recognize many of them. Big Man on Campus? The Mountain? Drew Carey's Green Screen Show? No idea.

Sorry.

Upfronts '05: What We Learned

I spent the bulk of this week at a technology conference in New York City. During one of the breaks, I was lamenting to a colleague about how I had come across the country, to the very city where the networks were giving their upfront presentation and unveiling their new fall line-ups, but instead was spending my time listening to the ins and outs of web syndication technologies.

The colleague lost me at “upfronts.” Yes, even people brilliant enough to discuss the relative strengths and weaknesses of RSS versus Atom syndication models and opine on the concept of “structured blogging” get a bit cross-eyed when they try to understand the insanity that is the television business.

So let’s break it down scientifically. For one week every year, the networks call all the local animal shelters and stables and reserve every single dog and pony in the Tri-State Area. The result are the upfronts, which are traditionally important because it’s the way that networks present their fall line-ups to advertisers. More importantly to you and me, however, this is the time when we find out which of the current crop of TV series are officially cancelled. We also get a glimpse (via excruciatingly vague press releases and hastily Photoshopped images) at the new shows that we’ll all be seeing this fall.

It’s a big time. And in the next few days, we at TeeVee will be trying our best to give you the ins and outs of each network’s schedule. (If you want to see a full prime time grid of the fall season, TeeVee pal Laurel Krahn has got you covered.) But in the meantime, here’s a quick overview of what happened this week.

Deserved deaths. Several cancelled shows have outlived their usefulness and been sent to the cornfield: 8 Simple Rules, Star Trek: Enterprise, Third Watch, Judging Amy, and Joan of Arcadia are the five best examples. Yes, those shows were on the air this year — you just didn’t notice. Proving that even the sun has to shop shining sometime, JAG is leaving our airwaves forever, although it is survived by NCIS. And the last remaining comedy or drama from TeeVee’s debut year of 1996, Everybody Loves Raymond, has retired. Do we feel old.

Undeserved deaths. You could argue that Eyes, Blind Justice, Jack and Bobby, and American Dreams deserved better. I won’t, but you could.

Undeserved life. If this were a normal year, you’d expect that Arrested Development, Jake in Progress, and The Office would be subject of much weeping and gnashing of teeth by angry fans who are simply furious at cruel network executives who cancelled these shows rather than sticking with them and giving them more of a chance to find an audience. (Well, except for Arrested Development, which I enjoy quite a bit but has proven that it couldn’t find an audience if it wandered into a Broadway theatre at showtime.)

But this is not a normal year. And so these ratings-challenged series are all back for the fall. Hooray for the cold-hearted network executives! Until all three of these shows get cancelled next May.

Franchise Mania is at an end. Law and Order: Trial By Jury, shitcanned by NBC, is the chirping canary in the television coal mine. It’s the first flop by a major franchise, and please let it be a brake on the expansion plans of CSI as well. My small prediction: next year will mark the end of another Law and Order show, and at least one CSI will start to seriously fade.

Bruckheimer Mania is at its peak. Überproducer Jerry Bruckheimer has ten shows on the air. At some point, the market for the slickly-produced procedural show is going to cool. I think it might be this year. But with so many irons in the fire, Bruckheimer will be a dominant TV force for years to come.

Attention aliens: please begin your invasion now. Following up on the success of Lost, the copycats at the networks have littered their schedules with stealth sci-fi series great and small. The three near-identical shows are NBC’s Fathom (a team of experts investigates strange happenings in the oceans!), ABC’s Invasion (a team of Florida townspeople investigates strange happenings after a hurricane!), and CBS’s Threshold (a team of experts investigates strange happenings in the oceans!). There’s just one problem with all of these Lost-like shows: Lost isn’t a show about alien invasions. So why the three identical alien plots? In other sci-fi news, there’s The Night Stalker, which would be an X-Files retread if The X-Files were not itself a retread of the original Night Stalker. And there’s Ghost Whisperer, which is a retread of Medium.

The Buffy employment plan is in effect. Willow’s got a job (CBS’s How I Met Your Mother). Xander’s got a job (Fox’s Kitchen Confidential). Angel’s got a job (Fox’s Bones). Oz’s got a job (NBC’s Four Kings). Even Angel’s Fred’s found work (CBS’s The Unit). Poor Eliza Dushku, whose Tru Calling was shown the door. Maybe she should’ve agreed to that Faith spin-off after all.

Comedy: dead or alive? Fox has approximately a zillion comedies on its fall schedule. NBC has four. Wow, way to find the next Friends, NBC! Even more shockingly, Fox has no reality TV shows on its fall line-up. (Yes, American Idol will be back in the spring.) Guess Fox has realized what the rest of us figured out two years ago: reality TV doesn’t suck. Fox reality TV sucks.

There were so many lessons we learned this week. These are only a few. Stay tuned for more in the next week, as we dive deep into the underbelly of each network’s fall schedule.

Mars Rising

In the end, she surprised me too.

When I reviewed Veronica Mars last fall, I liked what I saw — and didn’t think I’d get to see much more of it. A hard-boiled detective show starring a cute blonde high schooler? Which was actually worth watching? On UPN? I figured it wouldn’t outlast Wonderfalls

I’ve rarely been happier to be wrong. First Mars scored a full-season pickup, ensuring that her small but loyal fan following (and a good many smitten critics) would get to see Veronica solve the murder of her best friend, Lily Kane. Then the show trounced all comers in E! Online’s “Save This Show” poll with a whopping, unprecedented 66 percent of the vote. Finally, in a move that probably had Satan turning up the thermostat, UPN gave the show an early renewal for Season Two despite its meager ratings. That’s news worth leading a cheer for. (And I’m not just saying that because a guy I knew in college turned up as a guest star.)

Last Tuesday’s episode capped a surprise-packed season with the long-awaited unveiling of Lily Kane’s killer. I pride myself on staying several steps ahead of my favorite shows’ tangled plotlines, but Mars creator Rob Thomas (who also created TeeVee favorite Cupid) and his writers proved themselves masters of misdirection. During the course of the season, I twice thought that I’d sussed out the killer’s identity for certain. I was wrong both times.

Why was I so confused? Because on this show, no one’s quite who they seem. The thuggish biker’s got a sense of honor to balance his enthusiastically criminal nature. The snarky, sneering rich kid conceals genuine decency and compassion. That kind, inspiring teacher? He’s getting a little too close to his attractive young students. It would have been easy for Thomas and his team to make the victim herself a flawless little angel, but flashbacks revealed Lily as spoiled, callous and more than a little promiscuous. It’s difficult to feel sorry for anyone like that, no matter what their fate — difficult, but not impossible.

Mars wouldn’t let any character among its talented cast get away with being entirely “good” or “bad” — even Veronica herself. She was tough, smart and resourceful in pursuing Lily’s killer — but despite her reluctance, she was willing to use and manipulate the few friends she had, stretching their trust to the breaking point to further her investigation. Thomas allowed to see what, up until the season’s haunting final moments, Veronica couldn’t: Her search for Lily’s murderer was really an attempt to fix her own screwed-up life. And in that respect, it was doomed from the start.

Like plenty of good shows, Mars’ first-season storyline piled twist upon twist. Unlike too many shows — even some of my favorites — all those twists made sense. All the different clues to Lily’s killing added up to a coherent whole, with no hasty applications of retroactive continuity. (Alias, I’m looking in your direction.) The show’s plotline had the gripping feel of a great mystery novel — not surprising, considering Thomas originally conceived Mars as his fourth young-adult book.

What is surprising is just how dark the show can get. Veronica’s high school is a vicious and unforgiving place where the line between social mortification and actual physical harm is all too thin. Any show can be “daring” by showing teens drinking or using drugs; Mars doesn’t flinch at physical abuse, rape or the specter of incest. The season finale’s nightmarish climax — a terrified Veronica trapped inside a burning refrigerator, her dad Keith setting himself on fire to rescue her — packed as much punch as any of 24’s best moments. (It also nabbed Keith Mars the Most Badass Dad on TV Award, making previous contenders Jack Bristow and Jack Bauer look like spineless wusses in comparison.)

After all that, I should probably mention just how funny Mars can get. Any show that uses the high-school ladies’ room as its heroine’s impromptu office, or features a sleazy rival P.I. whose secretary is also his mom, can’t take itself entirely seriously. As Veronica, Kristen Bell has a million-dollar grin and a way with wisecracks unparalleled since the early, non-depressing years of Buffy.

In fact, plenty of critics have called Mars the natural successor to Buffy. Me? I just don’t see it. Sure, both shows have tiny blonde high schoolers fighting evil with the occasional help of a platonic male buddy, a sweetly geeky computer expert, and a rogue cheerleader. Sure, both heroines are pining for their broody, forehead-intensive ex-boyfriends, whom they can’t sleep with for fear of disaster (in Mars’ case, because he might have been her half-brother. Yikes.) And yeah, both heroines briefly dated a stand-up guy in law enforcement before ditching him for a quasi-psychotic bad boy with a heart of gold. But that’s no reason to… I mean, uh… wait a minute. Never mind. (I should add that in Mars’ case, imitation — however coincidental — turned out to be the sincerest form of awesomeness.)

Slayer similarities or not, Veronica Mars is one hell of a show. It may not be flashy or high-budget, but its quiet excellence grows on you episode by episode, and it almost never disappoints. That makes it my pick (sorry, Lost) for the season’s best new series. That said, it’s okay if you didn’t tune in all season. Some of you are probably still taking antibiotics from the last time you watched UPN. The network’s promos for the show were sincere but typically awful, and that’s assuming you even knew the show existed in the first place. Lucky for you, the first season should debut on blessedly UPN-free DVD in September, just in time to (hopefully) hook new fans. In the meantime, curious viewers should keep an eye peeled for summer reruns.

Veronica Mars’ early second-season renewal by the onetime home of WWE Smackdown is a sign that UPN might be ready for something better. And if that means more shows like this one make it to the air — and stay there — then heaven help me, I’ll be watching a lot more UPN in the future.

Provided I’ve gotten all my shots first.

[Reruns from Veronica Mars’ first season air Tuesday nights at 9 p.m. PT/ET on UPN.]

Amazing Fixes

I wholeheartedly endorse Phil's plan to fix The Amazing Race, and in fact would also like to subscribe to his newsletter.

However, let me rail again about the one thing about this (otherwise excellent) show that drives me up a tree: the constant equalizations that reward people who have fallen far behind, while punishing those who excel.

Last night's finale featured this multiple times. In the end, Uchenna and Joyce won -- which I knew a few months ago, thanks to a spoiler-hungry Vidiot who shall remain nameless (MONTY!) -- because Rob and Amber made one final mistake and went to the wrong intersection while looking for a cigar shop in Miami.

Them's the breaks. But let's recall that at one point on this leg Rob and Amber had a three-hour lead on one team and a seven-hour lead on the other. All of it wiped away by a queue-up at a location that didn't open until early morning. And Rob and Amber's idiotic mistake at the high-dive roadblock was wiped away as well.

There's just too much of that. I understand the need to keep some drama in the race, but to completely equalize the teams just seems unfair.

And by the way, one other minor gripe? When Phil (Keoghan, not Michaels) says "a race around the world," I expect him to mean it. Not "a race that gets as far as India and then pivots back round and heads west until it hits Miami."

The 'Amazing Race' Improvement Plan

[Editor’s Note: Michaels assures us that he wrote this piece well in advance of Tuesday night’s Amazing Race finale and tried to send it to us Tuesday morning, but was unable to connect to the Internet from Dulles International Airport where he was apparently flying out of on business that’s of no interest to us. This makes Michaels look like more of a chimp than usual, which is no small feat. Anyhow, enjoy his now-outdated ramblings.]

Sometime tonight, horrible Survivor alumni Rob and Amber will doubtlessly complete their unstoppable death march through The Amazing Race in triumph — a wonderful turn of events for the fawning schoolgirls who coo in delight at Rob’s every misdeed, but a dispiriting result for me, all other right-thinking people, and, assuming my theory is wrong and He hasn’t been on vacation for the past five years, God in His Heaven.

But you know what? It’s OK that these two awful, awful people already enriched beyond reason by CBS should take home yet another pile of reality TV-generated filthy lucre. The prize goes to the swiftest, not necessarily the most virtuous. They can’t all be Chip-and-Kim, folks — into every life, a little Freddy-and-Kendra must fall. So it’s hardly like Rob and Amber will be the most contemptible team to ever receive Phil Keoghan’s hearty congratulations at the finish line. And besides, after the $1 million prize from Survivor All Stars and the Mark Burnett-financed wedding, another $1 million is hardly life-changing money — really, it’s just enough to screw up their taxes at this point.

And the ultimate reason it will be perfectly acceptable to me if the contemptible Rob and Amber wind up beating out the slightly less unpleasant but still no great shakes Ron and Kelly or the genuinely nice but still somewhat bland Joyce and Uchenna? Because good winning team, bad winning team, or winning team clearly in league with Satan, The Amazing Race remains one of the most engaging, entertaining shows on television, scripted or un.

But that’s not to say the format couldn’t stand a little bit of tweaking, and no, I’m not talking about the teams-of-four-family-members concept apparently being trotted out for the next edition of The Amazing Race. What I have in mind are a few simple rule changes that will keep future contestants on their toes and viewers like myself on the edge of our seats. I offer these proposals merely as an interested Race observer, with no thought toward any financial compensation should any of them be adapted. (Unless, of course, they are, in which case you’ll be hearing from my attack lawyers, Bertram.)

Here are the modest changes I’d make to The Amazing Race if I were granted absolute dominion over time, space, and CBS’s programming:

The locals are not your personal sherpas. Not to keep dumping on Rob and Amber — though it’s fun and easy, too! — but last week’s episode in London featured America’s fun couple using their charms, wiles, and the presence of a camera crew to accompany them as their own personal tour guide. That week’s challenge required the racers to track down clues that would lead them to Sherlock Holmes’ address. “221 Baker Street,” the helpful limey said, unprompted, and while it’s great he knew that and all, it seems like the point of the race should be to have the actual contestants figure it for themselves, seeing as how the team name is Rob and Amber and not Rob and Amber and Some Guy They Shanghaied on the Underground. I mean, unless that guy is getting a cut of the prize money…

This isn’t the first time Rob and Amber used a local to shepherd them around a leg of the race — it happened in India, South Africa, and probably one or two other places I’m forgetting. It’s certainly not a violation of the rules — other teams in other seasons have done the exact same thing causing me the same amount of irritation — but it certainly seems to go against the principle of the race. Because why do we watch The Amazing Race? To see which teams can keep their wits about them as they battle unfamiliar surroundings, suboptimal traveling conditions, and ever-creeping fatigue? Or to see which ones can find the most helpful tour guides?

So I think there should be a rule discouraging such behavior, if not eliminating it outright. While you should certainly be able to ask the locals for directions — otherwise each leg would wind up going on for a week or two as racers stagger about some foreign locale — if someone physically accompanies you for a significant portion of the race then you should have to take a time penalty at the pit stop at the end of each race leg. I’m thinking an hour or two for each half-mile or so. Teams would still have the option of commandeering a helpful passerby, but they would now be forced to weigh the pros and cons of such a move. And the new rule would reward teams with the moxie to get from point A to point B on their own.

Fix the Fast-Forward. The Fast Forward, a one- or two-time-only event that lets one team skip all other tasks and go directly to the pit stop, should be one of the most exciting twists on The Amazing Race. Right now, it’s one of the dullest. Because, with only one team able to reap the rewards of a Fast-Forward, the minute other racers realize a team has opted to try to win the Fast-Forward, they’re loath to follow. After all, since the Fast-Forward usually involves a task that only one team at a time can perform, why waste chasing after a prize you’re not going to get?

So what I propose is, make the task that earns the Fast Forward something multiple teams can do at once — in other words, make it a race to the finish. This season, Rob and Amber had to stand around at a Fast-Forward to see if the contemptible team of Ray and Deana could walk across a Soweto tower — wouldn’t it have been more entertaining to have the two teams racing each other across the tower?

My colleague Jason Snell heard me suggest this and added the caveat that if the producers really want to encourage multiple teams to try and win Fast Forwards, they should bump up the prize — allow the winner of the Fast Forward to not only jump ahead to the pit stop but to skip the next leg of the race entirely.

That is why Jason runs the show around here — because he takes the ideas of us peons and makes them better. Also, he owns the server.

Prizes galore! Let me see if I can understand this: Joyce and Uchenna finish first in a leg so long that it’s spread out across two episodes and requires Joyce to shave off all her hair, and it turns out to be one of the few stops on The Amazing Race where a prize isn’t doled out to the front-runner. Joyce is a hell of a lot more mellow person than I am. Because if I show up in first place with a freshly shorn head only to find out that The Amazing Race producers have decided to stiff me, I’m not leaving that pit stop until I get my prize, even if it means cold-cocking Phil Keoghan and riffling through his wallet.

Here’s the new rule: You finish first, you get a prize. And that’s because…

Reward the front-runners. It seems patently unfair that a team can win leg after leg of The Amazing Race and then, because of an incompetent cabbie or obstinate barnyard animal or malfunctioning Soviet-era automobile, finish dead last and be shown the door. It seems to me you should be rewarded for your repeated success, and I’m not talking with free trips courtesy of Race sponsor Travelocity either.

So what I’d like to see is that teams that finish a leg in first place more than once receive the equivalent of a one-time-only Get Out of Jail Free card that they can use at any point in the race except for the final leg. That way, when a cruel quirk of fate causes an otherwise strong team to finish a leg at the back of the pack, they can use their one-time immunity pass to stave off elimination. They’ll have to forfeit all their cash, of course, and any prizes they’ve picked up along the way — because, remember: under my enlightened rule, we’re doling out prizes at every pit stop — but they get to stay in the race.

The advantages to this rule change are manifold. It places greater emphasis on teams to finish first. It rewards teams for their craft and savvy. And it reduces — if not eliminates entirely — the need for those ridiculous anti-climatic non-elimination legs.

Breathless Rob groupies currently composing angry e-mails to yours truly should note that this rule change would actually benefit the smirking meathead who has inexplicably won your affections. See? Not every rule has been devised as a retroactive way to punish future Robs and Ambers. I leave that to the cruel whims of the Almighty.

No more celebrities. Ever. OK — some rules are devised as a retroactive way to punish future Rob and Ambers. But if you’re the least bit interested in a reasonably level playing field, this makes perfect sense.

Ignoring the fact that part of the challenge of The Amazing Race is coping with the pressures of having a camera trained on you 24-7 as you try and negotiate your way around the world, pitting a team that’s already enjoyed more than its share of camera time against teams of nobodies gives the aforementioned team an advantage that’s neither a matter of acquired skills or an accident of birth. And with the last leg of Race usually concluding in America, the disparity becomes even greater. Since most people in this country treat fame like a communicable disease — hang around a famous person long enough and maybe you’ll catch it, too! — any team of celebrities, even reality-show celebrities, can count on aid and assistance from gushing fans and star-struck passersby. Any team just a few minutes behind Rob and Amber tonight when The Amazing Race returns to America best work on their concession speech.

So no more celebrities — at least, not in races involving civilians. The Amazing Race wants to do some sort of All-Star edition or a season peopled entirely by reality show veterans, fine and dandy. I can always make alternative viewing plans. But don’t stack the deck against other racers just because it gooses the ratings.

Next week — how to fix American Idol. It involves having Paula Abdul sleep with more contestants.

In Praise Of Deadwood

I had resisted jumping aboard Deadwood's covered bandwagon mostly I dislike the hooyah that swirls around first-season shows. It's not hard for a show to be good in its first season: sustaining the quality through the second or third season is the real trick. Plus, I've liked two HBO shows that started off with a promise and degenerated into excuses. As far as I'm concerned, the goodwill Six Feet Under built up during its first season was squandered by the time Brenda became a sex fiend in later seasons, and whatever dark allure Clancy Brown held for me on Carnivale was outweighed by my lava-hot irritation with the season finale in the recently-finished second season.

Finally, there was my irritation with Quality Television Fans. Although they are not quite as annoying as the tiresome I-Don't-Have-A-Television crowd, they share some of the same traits. For example, both crowds confuse being fussy with having a working brain. But I'll say this for the I-Don't-Have-A-Television crowd: at least they're willing to write off an entire medium in the name of snobbery, while for Quality Television Fans, the very notion of "quality" is based on some abstruse collection of vague arguments, nearly all of which devolve to one faulty premise: their taste is better than yours.

So you can see why I mistrust the recommendations of people who are inordinately enamored of their own prowess in selecting television shows. And you can see why I'm just petty enough to want to avoid doing anything which can be construed as bolstering the cases Quality Television Fans make for whatever their current darling is. Which is why it's killing me to admit that prior to the second season of Deadwood, I did sit down, watch the first season in a weekend-long marathon and like it enough to bother TiVoing the second season. And then I did watch the first four episodes of season two back-to-back before confirming that verily, Deadwood is shaping up to be more like The Wire than Six Feet Under. In other words, it's looking like a show where the creators have an idea of where they want the show to go and how it's going to get there. And they want you to have fun on the ride.

However, like The Wire, this really is the kind of show that does benefit from the feast-and-famine cycle of viewing. Save up the episodes and watch a few at a time. this way, you can more easily detect the plot elements set into motion in one episode and track them through subsequent hours. You'll get more gratification as a viewer because clusters of episodes provide complete narrative arcs in more robustly satisfying ways than individual episodes do. You're more able to see the gears and levers propelling the story, and such elegant structure goes a long way toward alleviating the worry that trusting the show's creator is a sucker's bet. As with balance sheets, transparency in fundamentals goes a long way toward bolstering the public trust without erasing the miracle and wonder of a hefty bottom line.

And then there's the cussing. Although Deadwood poobah David Milch likes to point out that the Wild West was precisely so because it was populated by people who figured out how to use the word "cocksucker" as a preposition, I have to admit that the giddy thrill I get when I listen to the flowery yet profanity-laden monologues does not have its roots in any appreciation for historical versimilitude. I like listening to the cussing because it's cussing, plain and simple. And also because I hope to someday cow others with my total mastery of F-bomb dropping.

I don't worry that admitting I like Deadwood makes me one of the Quality Television Fans. For one, I am on the record as loving stupid television. For another, my favorite the-masses-are-asses argument in re: television currently centers on Jason Priestley's underappreciated turn on Tru Calling, so I'm clearly in no danger of aweing anyone with my exquisite discrimination. All I'm here to tell you is, sometimes Quality Television Fans are actually backing an entertaining show. And sometimes, those shows teach you to cuss. So give Deadwood a look-see.

Categories

Monthly Archives

Pages

Powered by Movable Type 4.25

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from May 2005 listed from newest to oldest.

April 2005 is the previous archive.

June 2005 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.